Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinKickerFeaturesTopicsRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Increased Fraud Penalties Are on the Horizon

By David Debold and Matthew Benjamin
June 28, 2012

The guidelines governing the sentencing of fraud offenses ' long criticized as irrational, unduly severe, and the product of overt political pressure ' require wholesale reform. A diverse group of stakeholders, including federal judges, defense lawyers, academics, and even the Department of Justice (DOJ), have implored the U.S. Sentencing Commission (the Commission) to conduct a comprehensive review of the fraud guidelines, memorably derided by Judge Frederick Block as “a black stain on common sense.”

In the wake of this uncommon consensus, as well as Congress's directive in the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that the Commission revisit the penalties for financial institution fraud and securities fraud, the Commission has signaled that a comprehensive, multi-year review may finally materialize. In the short-term, however, the Commission's approach is less ambitious. On April 13, 2012, it responded to Congress's Dodd-Frank directive by promulgating more narrow, piecemeal amendments to the guidelines for securities fraud, mortgage fraud and financial institution fraud ' a modest course of action that is unlikely to satisfy the fraud guidelines' many critics.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.