Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The treatment of personal identifiable information (PII) is quickly becoming a critical issue and should be on litigation support's risk and information governance agenda. Certain industry sectors that lawyers represent may have a duty to protect PII. For some corporations, such as financial or medical, the duty to protect PII may be highly regulated; while in other industries that compile personal information as statistical information, education or government for example, the duty may be self imposed through Acts or executive order. Where industry does compile personal identifiable information and there is a duty to protect this information, companies are moving to regulate this information within their internal systems. What happens when PII is transmitted to litigation support as part of client information subject to an adversarial action? What is PII anyway? Does litigation support have a duty to protect PII on behalf of the law firm's client? If there is a duty, how should litigation support react to protect PII?
PII Defined
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.