Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Tenth Circuit Holding Broadens Scope of Internet Communications
On June 11, 2012, in United States v. Kieffer, 681 F.3d 1143 (10th Cir. 6/11/12), the Tenth Circuit held that testimony by website end-users in two different states was sufficient proof that “a transmission in interstate commerce” occurred, as required for conviction under the federal wire fraud statute, 18 U.S.C.
' 1343. The case involved false statements, contempt of court and wire-fraud allegations against defendant Howard Kieffer, a now somewhat notorious criminal defense “attorney” who practiced law without a license, representing scores of individuals as a trial and post-trial advocate and gaining admission to federal trial and appellate courts across the country despite never having attended law school or sat for any bar examination.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.