Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Rolex Can't Block Ralph Lauren from Registering RLX Mark
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued an order holding that Ralph Lauren Corp.'s products bearing the trademark RLX do not infringe Rolex's trademark ROLEX. The mark RLX is displayed next to the well-known RALPH LAUREN mark. “[G]iven the different connotation and commercial impression engendered by the presence of the well-known mark RALPH LAUREN, when viewing the mark in its entirety, consumers will perceive RLX as Mr. Lauren's initials and not an abbreviation of ROLEX.” Slip Op. at 22. “Because the marks are sufficiently different, the du Pont factor of the dissimilarities of the marks outweighs the other relevant du Pont factors.” Id. at 25. The opposition was dismissed.
Howard J. Shire is a partner and Joseph Mercadante is an associate in the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP.
Rolex Can't Block Ralph Lauren from Registering RLX Mark
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board issued an order holding that Ralph Lauren Corp.'s products bearing the trademark RLX do not infringe Rolex's trademark ROLEX. The mark RLX is displayed next to the well-known RALPH LAUREN mark. “[G]iven the different connotation and commercial impression engendered by the presence of the well-known mark RALPH LAUREN, when viewing the mark in its entirety, consumers will perceive RLX as Mr. Lauren's initials and not an abbreviation of ROLEX.” Slip Op. at 22. “Because the marks are sufficiently different, the du Pont factor of the dissimilarities of the marks outweighs the other relevant du Pont factors.” Id. at 25. The opposition was dismissed.
Howard J. Shire is a partner and Joseph Mercadante is an associate in the
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.