Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As discussed last month, married parties are generally permitted by the common law, and sometimes by statutory law, to keep their spouses from testifying against them. The common-law basis of this spousal privilege was society's interest in promoting the strength of marriage by encouraging open communications between husbands and wives. Siveke v. Keena, 110 Misc.2d 4 (1981). The State of New York has codified the spousal confidentiality privilege at subdivision (b) of Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) ' 4502. It states: “(b) Confidential communication privileged. A husband or wife shall not be required, or, without consent of the other if living, allowed, to disclose a confidential communication made by one to the other during marriage.”
An Exception, Now Repealed
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.