Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As discussed last month, married parties are generally permitted by the common law, and sometimes by statutory law, to keep their spouses from testifying against them. The common-law basis of this spousal privilege was society's interest in promoting the strength of marriage by encouraging open communications between husbands and wives. Siveke v. Keena, 110 Misc.2d 4 (1981). The State of New York has codified the spousal confidentiality privilege at subdivision (b) of Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) ' 4502. It states: “(b) Confidential communication privileged. A husband or wife shall not be required, or, without consent of the other if living, allowed, to disclose a confidential communication made by one to the other during marriage.”
An Exception, Now Repealed
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.