Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has become the second court of appeals to reject the government's broad interpretation of the statute defining “proceeds” for purposes of federal forfeiture proceedings. Agreeing with the Tenth Circuit, the Second Circuit held in a pair of securities fraud cases last month that the defendants could only be ordered to forfeit the net profits they received, not the gross revenues generated by the offense. United States v. Contorinis, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 3538270 (2d Cir. Aug. 17, 2012); United States v. Mahaffy, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 3125209 (2d Cir. Aug. 2, 2012).
The Second Circuit's decisions furnish an occasion to review the state of the “proceeds” statute, 18 U.S.C. ' 981(a)(2), a dozen years after its enactment as part of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA). As the Supreme Court has observed, “proceeds” is an inherently ambiguous word. United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 511 (2008). While ' 981(a)(2) presumably was intended to limit that ambiguity, Congress' somewhat unusual choice of wording has instead spawned a host of interpretive difficulties, which have divided courts and done little to clarify what “proceeds” means in a particular case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.