Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has become the second court of appeals to reject the government's broad interpretation of the statute defining “proceeds” for purposes of federal forfeiture proceedings. Agreeing with the Tenth Circuit, the Second Circuit held in a pair of securities fraud cases last month that the defendants could only be ordered to forfeit the net profits they received, not the gross revenues generated by the offense. United States v. Contorinis, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 3538270 (2d Cir. Aug. 17, 2012); United States v. Mahaffy, ___ F.3d ___, 2012 WL 3125209 (2d Cir. Aug. 2, 2012).
The Second Circuit's decisions furnish an occasion to review the state of the “proceeds” statute, 18 U.S.C. ' 981(a)(2), a dozen years after its enactment as part of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA). As the Supreme Court has observed, “proceeds” is an inherently ambiguous word. United States v. Santos, 553 U.S. 507, 511 (2008). While ' 981(a)(2) presumably was intended to limit that ambiguity, Congress' somewhat unusual choice of wording has instead spawned a host of interpretive difficulties, which have divided courts and done little to clarify what “proceeds” means in a particular case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.