Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Leasing Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

In the Spotlight: The Rule Against Perpetuities

By Donna Hoelscher Suchan and Patrick T. Fitzgerald
August 29, 2012

The legendary Rule Against Perpetuities (“the Rule”) originated centuries ago. Today, it continues to generate strikingly complex legal problems worthy of judicial review. In the context of commercial leases, it is important to be aware of when and if the Rule applies. Specifically, variations in the law exist as to when and if the Rule applies to preemptive rights, options to purchase and lease renewal options, and the law continues to evolve. (Many states have some version of the Rule, so practitioners are cautioned to check the applicable statutes. This article uses New York as an example to discuss the complications that can arise when the Rule is applied to leases.) As recently as 2011, the New York Court of Appeals addressed the Rule's applicability when a series of lease renewal options extend many years into the future.

The judicially created common law Rule dates back to 17th-century England, and its purpose is to avoid the suspension of alienation or remote vesting for periods of time considered to be “socially undesirable.” Throughout history, this occurred when people gifted property to their heirs or beneficiaries with restrictions attached that limited whether, when or to whom that property could later be sold. Courts developed the Rule to prevent current owners from restricting (beyond the Rule's time limits) the rights of subsequent owners to sell their property in an effort to encourage investment in, and maintenance, development and use of, the property. As a result of its success, the Rule similarly became a creature of American common law, where it was eventually codified and later enacted as a statute in New York State.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.