Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Leasing Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

In the Spotlight: The Rule Against Perpetuities

By Donna Hoelscher Suchan and Patrick T. Fitzgerald

The legendary Rule Against Perpetuities (“the Rule”) originated centuries ago. Today, it continues to generate strikingly complex legal problems worthy of judicial review. In the context of commercial leases, it is important to be aware of when and if the Rule applies. Specifically, variations in the law exist as to when and if the Rule applies to preemptive rights, options to purchase and lease renewal options, and the law continues to evolve. (Many states have some version of the Rule, so practitioners are cautioned to check the applicable statutes. This article uses New York as an example to discuss the complications that can arise when the Rule is applied to leases.) As recently as 2011, the New York Court of Appeals addressed the Rule's applicability when a series of lease renewal options extend many years into the future.

The judicially created common law Rule dates back to 17th-century England, and its purpose is to avoid the suspension of alienation or remote vesting for periods of time considered to be “socially undesirable.” Throughout history, this occurred when people gifted property to their heirs or beneficiaries with restrictions attached that limited whether, when or to whom that property could later be sold. Courts developed the Rule to prevent current owners from restricting (beyond the Rule's time limits) the rights of subsequent owners to sell their property in an effort to encourage investment in, and maintenance, development and use of, the property. As a result of its success, the Rule similarly became a creature of American common law, where it was eventually codified and later enacted as a statute in New York State.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.