Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Understanding Landlords' 'Self-Help' Rights
“Self-help,” in a leasing context, typically refers to the landlord's traditional remedy of locking out the defaulting tenant and taking back the premises without going through the judicial system. Historically, under the common law, a landlord was free to choose its remedies against a defaulting tenant with few limitations, including the liberal use of self-help. However, modern jurisprudence provides tenants with much greater protection from eviction and also seeks to prevent possible violent landlord-tenant confrontations. Therefore, the majority of states have now abolished the traditional rule of self-help, and permit landlords to evict tenants only through court proceedings. In connection with the move away from self-help, most states have established summary eviction proceedings which, in theory, provide landlords with a more efficient and expedient method of retaking possession than traditional civil litigation.
Even with respect to those states that continue to recognize a landlord's right to self-help, many attorneys are very reluctant to recommend this remedy for their landlord clients, given: 1) the exposure for significant liability to the tenant if the tenant has a valid defense to the alleged default; 2) the availability of summary ejectment proceedings; and 3) the often correct perception that courts take a dim or outright hostile view toward self-help. Further, in the minority of states that still permit a landlord to exercise self-help, the remedy is often limited to commercial landlords, as residential tenants are afforded much greater protection. For the commercial landlord or tenant, this article focuses on the widely differing treatment of self-help ' using the respective laws in the neighboring jurisdictions of Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia as illustrative of these differences.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.