Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Film Budgets Subject to Public Disclosure
The Supreme Court of Iowa ruled that filmmakers that received state tax credits couldn't enjoin the public release of the films' final budgets. Iowa Film Production Services v. Iowa Department of Economic Development, 10-1719. Iowa's Film Television and Video Project Promotion Program was enacted in 2007 but later suspended over government mismanagement issues. The filmmakers had asked for confidential treatment when submitting their initial applications. Final budgets, required to be submitted later, were sought by the Des Moines Register & Tribune. The state supreme court noted of the budgets information: “The record does not show that the Producers made reasonable efforts to preserve confidentiality of their financial data as against the outside world in general. ' The Producers failed to show, for instance, that individuals who worked for them and came into contact with this information were required not to disclose it.” The court concluded the final budgets didn't qualify as protectable trade secrets under Iowa Code '22.7(3).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.