Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When Liability Is Reasonably Clear, Insurer Has Duty to Attempt to Effectuate Settlement
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently held that, under California law, an insurer has a duty to promptly effectuate settlement when liability of its insured is reasonably clear, even absent a settlement demand by the claimant. In so doing, the Court of Appeals apparently expanded upon existing California law, which previously required that an insurer accept a reasonable settlement demand within policy limits, but did not impose a duty to proactively effectuate settlement even absent a demand. Du v. Allstate Ins. Co. et al., 681 F.3d 1118, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 11755, 2012 WL 2086584 (9th Cir. Cal. 2012).
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.