Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Criminal Conviction Does Not Equal Franchise Termination
A recent case from the Federal District Court in New Jersey highlights the risk involved in terminating a franchisee based on a criminal conviction. International House of Pancakes, LLC v. Parsippany Pancake House, Inc., Bus. Franchise Guide (CCH) ' 14,856 (D. N.J. Jun. 27, 2012). The background of the case is that IHOP, the franchisor, had entered into a franchise agreement with Parsippany Pancake House, Inc. (“Pancake House”) in 2005. The franchise agreement gave Pancake House the right to operate an IHOP restaurant and use IHOP's trademarks during the term of the franchise agreement.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.