Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The question of whether a defendant had willfully infringed a patent has typically been decided by a jury. However, under Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Assoc., Inc., 682 F.3d 1003 (Fed. Cir. 2012) (“Bard II “), a judge may now have the exclusive role of determining whether a jury is entitled to decide this question.
A finding of willful patent infringement can lead to an enhancement of damages, within the court's discretion. A successful claim of willful infringement requires proof of both: a) the infringer's objectively reckless infringement (an objective prong) as well as b) that the objectively defined risk was either known or should have been known by the infringer (a subjective prong). See In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (en banc). On June 14, 2012, the Federal Circuit ruled that the objective prong of the Seagate willfulness test, although admittedly potentially predicated on factual issues, is best decided by a judge, as a question of law, as opposed to a common practice of treating the entire question as one for the jury. Bard II.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.