Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although no federal statute explicitly prohibits employment discrimination based on gender identity, courts have increasingly held that transgender individuals are protected from discrimination under federal law. (Note: The terms “sex,” “gender,” “sexual orientation” and “transgender” are distinguishable. “Sex” is a term used to denote whether an individual is biologically male or female. “Gender” refers to an individual's external characteristics and behaviors such as appearance, dress, mannerisms, speech patterns, and social interactions that are perceived as masculine or feminine, regardless of their biological sex, with “gender identity” being a person's internal, deeply felt sense of being male, female, something other or in-between. “Sexual orientation” describes an individual's enduring physical, romantic and/or emotional attraction to another person. “Transgender” is an umbrella term for people whose gender identity and/or gender expression differs from the sex they were assigned at birth.) Indeed, on April 20, 2012, in the landmark ruling Macy v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, EEOC Appeal No. 0120120821 (April 23, 2012), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) held that transgender individuals may state a claim for sex discrimination under Title VII.
The Macy ruling by the EEOC serves as a reminder to employers that they must become more attuned to issues related to employees' gender identity and/or expression, in addition to other protected characteristics under federal law.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.