Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Applying technology to an inefficient process will give you a net gain of zero. Throwing technology at a problem without first looking at the process will rarely fix it. In fact, it may exacerbate the problem by adding another layer of complexity to existing process challenges.
A great misconception about technology is that it is a quick fix for everything ' a Band-Aid of sorts. Often, lawyers uncover a problem in their firms and immediately seek to solve it with technology rather than examining their process first. For example, lawyers frequently realize their firms are missing billing opportunities. As a solution, many opt for more sophisticated software only to discover that the cause of the problem is process-related, that there is a break in the process by which staff captures billable time and events. In this case, the most effective solution would have been to refine the process.
Lawyers invest money in technology to improve their practices. Yet, if they don't begin by addressing the root of their problems, the result is no different than throwing good money after bad. They must begin by addressing their process challenges. Then, they must look to how technology can play a supporting role.
How to Tackle Process Challenges
To quote William Deming, “85% of a worker's effectiveness is determined by the system he works within, only 15% by his own skill.” Hence, in addressing operational challenges, lawyers should first seek to determine if their process is effective and efficient.
Process improvement can seem like a scary notion. The secret to success is to keep it simple and methodical. We've examined complex, yet popular, business management philosophies and have found that by extracting basic methodologies and applying them to the practice of law, a straightforward formula for improving a law firm's business process can be established.
Define the Problem
The first step to solving any problem is awareness: Identify the problem. Lawyers can't fix problems of which they are unaware. Talking to staff raises awareness; they are the ones doing the work. Getting a team together and including everyone who plays a role in the process is crucial to success of any process improvement initiative.
Often during an improvement initiative, a lawyer discovers that his perception of the problem differs from reality; that his understanding of the problem is not aligned with the challenges faced by the staff. He may believe, for example, that the process used by his office for matter intake is efficient. He may uncover that in reality, the process itself isn't broken, but inefficient due to the amount of paper generated and that by making the process paperless and supporting it with the right technology, he can reduce the costs associated with that process by 50%.
Measure the Problem
Once the problem is defined, it must be measured. Measuring involves observing what staff does and documenting it, as well as understanding the “why” behind everything they do. It is not uncommon for lawyers to discover that staff does things simply because that's the way they've always done them. In improving the process, changing this entrenched mentality is half the battle. Creating a cultural shift that embraces change is integral to process refinement.
A fundamental component of measuring the problem is identifying wasted resources. Signs of waste include: mistakes that cause re-work, piles of files sitting on the floor or on desks and long processing times. Waste leads to unnecessary costs and decreased profitability.
Lawyers can leverage technology to eliminate waste. Having a sound process drives the work, while using the right technology allows lawyers to do that work.
Analyze the Problem
The next step is to analyze what has been measured or observed. Flowcharts are an ideal analytical tool for this. The process should be mapped out so that waste can be identified and eliminated. Sometimes, simple changes that lead to a quick return on investment can be made. For example, e-mailing rather than mailing or faxing is a simple but effective way to cut costs.
Perhaps, the changes may be greater. There may be cases where frequent mistakes are made causing the need for re-work. Re-work is a form of waste, the cost of which comes out of the lawyer's pocket, not the client's, thus diminishing profit margin. Technology can be leveraged to help avoid mistakes in a process. The use of pop-up windows is a perfect example of how technology can support the process by alerting staff to possible mistakes.
Implement the Solution
Once the best solution has been identified, it must be implemented. One of the most important points to remember about implementation is training. Staff must be trained on any changes made to the process and technology. In order to properly train staff, the new changes must be documented in the form of Standard Operating Procedures. Not only will this serve as a method of standardizing practices within the firm, it serves as a reference for existing and future staff.
Measure the Improvements
Now that the best solution has been implemented, process improvements must be measured. The key to measuring the new process is to implement metrics. For example, if changes were made to the billing process to capture more billing opportunities, metrics should be implemented that track the new billable amounts. How much is being billed now in comparison with last month? The only way to confirm that improvements are working is to quantify the change. Metrics are fundamental to tracking return on investment.
Good Technology vs. Right Technology
When lawyers consider the technology in which to invest, one of the most important questions they should ask themselves is, “Does this technology support the way I do business? Does it support my process?” Just because technology is good does not make it the right technology for the way a particular lawyer does business. Lawyers should choose the technology that best supports their process.
In reality, not every lawyer is in the market for new technology ' and not every lawyer should be. Frequently, the solution lies in a lawyer's existing system. Sometimes, it can be as simple as making changes to existing technology so that it begins to support the firm's process. It is about turning existing technology into the right technology.
Conclusion
Each law firm has its own individual formula for achieving success. They hire the best lawyers and the best staff; they buy the best equipment and the best technology. In order for lawyers to take their practices to the next level, they must also remember to include good process and the right technology in their formula, and leverage the relationship between the two. By addressing their process challenges and making the right changes in their technology so that it supports the way they do business, lawyers can achieve greater efficiency and accuracy, which ultimately means a healthier bottom line.
Applying technology to an inefficient process will give you a net gain of zero. Throwing technology at a problem without first looking at the process will rarely fix it. In fact, it may exacerbate the problem by adding another layer of complexity to existing process challenges.
A great misconception about technology is that it is a quick fix for everything ' a Band-Aid of sorts. Often, lawyers uncover a problem in their firms and immediately seek to solve it with technology rather than examining their process first. For example, lawyers frequently realize their firms are missing billing opportunities. As a solution, many opt for more sophisticated software only to discover that the cause of the problem is process-related, that there is a break in the process by which staff captures billable time and events. In this case, the most effective solution would have been to refine the process.
Lawyers invest money in technology to improve their practices. Yet, if they don't begin by addressing the root of their problems, the result is no different than throwing good money after bad. They must begin by addressing their process challenges. Then, they must look to how technology can play a supporting role.
How to Tackle Process Challenges
To quote William Deming, “85% of a worker's effectiveness is determined by the system he works within, only 15% by his own skill.” Hence, in addressing operational challenges, lawyers should first seek to determine if their process is effective and efficient.
Process improvement can seem like a scary notion. The secret to success is to keep it simple and methodical. We've examined complex, yet popular, business management philosophies and have found that by extracting basic methodologies and applying them to the practice of law, a straightforward formula for improving a law firm's business process can be established.
Define the Problem
The first step to solving any problem is awareness: Identify the problem. Lawyers can't fix problems of which they are unaware. Talking to staff raises awareness; they are the ones doing the work. Getting a team together and including everyone who plays a role in the process is crucial to success of any process improvement initiative.
Often during an improvement initiative, a lawyer discovers that his perception of the problem differs from reality; that his understanding of the problem is not aligned with the challenges faced by the staff. He may believe, for example, that the process used by his office for matter intake is efficient. He may uncover that in reality, the process itself isn't broken, but inefficient due to the amount of paper generated and that by making the process paperless and supporting it with the right technology, he can reduce the costs associated with that process by 50%.
Measure the Problem
Once the problem is defined, it must be measured. Measuring involves observing what staff does and documenting it, as well as understanding the “why” behind everything they do. It is not uncommon for lawyers to discover that staff does things simply because that's the way they've always done them. In improving the process, changing this entrenched mentality is half the battle. Creating a cultural shift that embraces change is integral to process refinement.
A fundamental component of measuring the problem is identifying wasted resources. Signs of waste include: mistakes that cause re-work, piles of files sitting on the floor or on desks and long processing times. Waste leads to unnecessary costs and decreased profitability.
Lawyers can leverage technology to eliminate waste. Having a sound process drives the work, while using the right technology allows lawyers to do that work.
Analyze the Problem
The next step is to analyze what has been measured or observed. Flowcharts are an ideal analytical tool for this. The process should be mapped out so that waste can be identified and eliminated. Sometimes, simple changes that lead to a quick return on investment can be made. For example, e-mailing rather than mailing or faxing is a simple but effective way to cut costs.
Perhaps, the changes may be greater. There may be cases where frequent mistakes are made causing the need for re-work. Re-work is a form of waste, the cost of which comes out of the lawyer's pocket, not the client's, thus diminishing profit margin. Technology can be leveraged to help avoid mistakes in a process. The use of pop-up windows is a perfect example of how technology can support the process by alerting staff to possible mistakes.
Implement the Solution
Once the best solution has been identified, it must be implemented. One of the most important points to remember about implementation is training. Staff must be trained on any changes made to the process and technology. In order to properly train staff, the new changes must be documented in the form of Standard Operating Procedures. Not only will this serve as a method of standardizing practices within the firm, it serves as a reference for existing and future staff.
Measure the Improvements
Now that the best solution has been implemented, process improvements must be measured. The key to measuring the new process is to implement metrics. For example, if changes were made to the billing process to capture more billing opportunities, metrics should be implemented that track the new billable amounts. How much is being billed now in comparison with last month? The only way to confirm that improvements are working is to quantify the change. Metrics are fundamental to tracking return on investment.
Good Technology vs. Right Technology
When lawyers consider the technology in which to invest, one of the most important questions they should ask themselves is, “Does this technology support the way I do business? Does it support my process?” Just because technology is good does not make it the right technology for the way a particular lawyer does business. Lawyers should choose the technology that best supports their process.
In reality, not every lawyer is in the market for new technology ' and not every lawyer should be. Frequently, the solution lies in a lawyer's existing system. Sometimes, it can be as simple as making changes to existing technology so that it begins to support the firm's process. It is about turning existing technology into the right technology.
Conclusion
Each law firm has its own individual formula for achieving success. They hire the best lawyers and the best staff; they buy the best equipment and the best technology. In order for lawyers to take their practices to the next level, they must also remember to include good process and the right technology in their formula, and leverage the relationship between the two. By addressing their process challenges and making the right changes in their technology so that it supports the way they do business, lawyers can achieve greater efficiency and accuracy, which ultimately means a healthier bottom line.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.