Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Jury Rejects 'Zoloft Defense,' But Misconduct Alleged
The California judge who oversaw the kidnapping and rape trial of Anthony Orban has called for an inquiry to determine if there was jury misconduct. Orban claimed he committed his crimes while under the influence of Zoloft, which he said made him black out, rendering him not responsible for his actions. Jurors in the case were asked during voir dire whether they had ever taken the antidepressant Zoloft, or whether they had any strong opinions about such drugs. One juror who indicated that she had not taken Zoloft allegedly later told a fellow juror that she had, and that it had not affected her mental competence. The discrepancy came to light when a juror contacted the convicted man's defense firm to report the overheard conversation. If the inquiry ends with a finding of misconduct, a new trial may be ordered.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.