Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Trademark owners have an affirmative duty to enforce their rights in their brands in order to avoid the damage caused by infringement and dilution in the marketplace. This is not to say that trademark owners have a duty to pursue unauthorized uses that have only limited potential to conflict with the trademark owner's rights. Finding an effective middle ground between overly enthusiastic and overly lenient enforcement policies is essential to the development of an effective trademark policing strategy.
Overly aggressive enforcement of trademark rights by high-profile brand owners can lead to consumer backlash when such enforcement is perceived as “trademark bullying” of the “little guy.” Such enforcement efforts have grown increasingly hazardous during the era of Internet blogging and social networking. These mediums have given individuals and small businesses a very tall “soapbox” from which to voice their complaints.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.