Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Intellectual Property StrategistKickerSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Seventh Circuit Protects Trademark Licensees in Bankruptcy Court

By Judith L. Grubner
November 02, 2012

An executory contract is one where the material obligations of both parties have not yet been substantially performed. Section 365(a) of the Bankruptcy Code allows a bankruptcy trustee to reject the executory portion of contracts made with the debtor. In 1985, the Fourth Circuit concluded that when a trustee in bankruptcy rejects an executory intellectual property license, the licensee loses all rights to use the licensed patents, trademarks or copyrights. Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985). In 1988, Congress partly overruled that decision by adding ' 365(n) to the Bankruptcy Code. That provision permits a licensee to continue to use the licensed intellectual property (with certain conditions, such as paying royalties) after rejection by the trustee. However, ' 365(n) only covers patent, copyright and trade secret licenses, not trademark licenses. Some courts have inferred from that omission that Lubrizol still applies to trademark licenses, ending the licensee's rights when the license is rejected by the trustee.

The Seventh Circuit has now adopted the conflicting view that ' 365(n) does not affect trademark licenses in one way or another and that Lubrizol was incorrectly decided. Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, __ F.3d __ (7th Cir. 2012).

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.