Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Nov. 15, the U.S. Senate declined to approve S. 3414, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012, introduced by senators Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME), and supported by the Obama administration. (See, www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s3414.) The proposed legislation would have set voluntary cybersecurity standards for owners of the nation's critical infrastructure, such as gas pipelines, utilities and banks. The bill also would have authorized companies and the government to share information about online threats. Most supported the information-sharing provisions of the proposed legislation, but many businesses were concerned that even voluntary standards could impose new liabilities upon them and that the act did not provide adequate liability protection to address those risks.
Executive Order
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.