Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Matrimonial StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

For Better or for Worse: The Case Against Referenda on Marriage Equality

By Frank Gulino
December 27, 2012

On Nov. 6, 2012, voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington made history when they voted to legalize same-sex marriage. After defeats in each and every one of 32 prior state ballot initiatives, the 2012 Election Day victories marked the first time that supporters of marriage equality succeeded at the ballot box. Within days following the election, a published report indicated that, in the wake of the referenda successes, gay rights activists were preparing for another ballot initiative to legalize same-sex marriage, this time in the state of Oregon. See Harry Esteve, Oregon May Be Next State For Gay Marriage Ballot Battle, HuffPost Religion, Nov. 11, 2012, www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/11/oregon-gay-marriage-ballot_n_2110014.html. But while it is natural for same-sex marriage supporters to want to ride the current wave of ballot box victories for marriage equality, that instinct should be resisted because popular-vote referenda are simply not the appropriate vehicle for determining fundamental individual rights, like the right to marry.

The 2012 Referenda on Marriage Equality

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.