Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Nov. 6, 2012, voters in Maine, Maryland and Washington made history when they voted to legalize same-sex marriage. After defeats in each and every one of 32 prior state ballot initiatives, the 2012 Election Day victories marked the first time that supporters of marriage equality succeeded at the ballot box. Within days following the election, a published report indicated that, in the wake of the referenda successes, gay rights activists were preparing for another ballot initiative to legalize same-sex marriage, this time in the state of Oregon. See Harry Esteve, Oregon May Be Next State For Gay Marriage Ballot Battle, HuffPost Religion, Nov. 11, 2012, www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/11/oregon-gay-marriage-ballot_n_2110014.html. But while it is natural for same-sex marriage supporters to want to ride the current wave of ballot box victories for marriage equality, that instinct should be resisted because popular-vote referenda are simply not the appropriate vehicle for determining fundamental individual rights, like the right to marry.
The 2012 Referenda on Marriage Equality
In the State of Washington, a bill permitting same-sex marriage was signed into law on Feb. 13, 2012; it was to have taken effect 90 days after the end of the legislative session. But opponents moved quickly, taking advantage of a clause in the statute that permitted the law to be tested by public referendum. In Maryland, a statute legalizing same-sex marriage was signed into law on March 1, 2012; it was to become effective on Jan.1, 2013. But as in Washington, opponents of the Maryland law soon began a drive to place the issue before the electorate in November. As a result of the efforts by marriage equality opponents, referenda appeared on the ballot in both states on Election Day 2012, asking voters to make a choice between granting and prohibiting the right of same-sex couples to marry.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.