Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The nanotechnology industry and other interested stakeholders have kept a keen eye on various governmental regulatory bodies regarding the regulation and oversight of nanotechnology and nanomaterials. Since the mid-2000s, such bodies have generally taken a cautious approach. They have tended to utilize existing regulatory frameworks and have generally eschewed creating new frameworks or issuing regulations specific to nanotechnology. It is unlikely that this approach will continue forever as political pressure may ultimately lead to the creation of nanotechnology-specific regulatory regimes. What will such regulation look like? What would be the parameters? What definitions may be employed? To answer these questions, we may look not only to individual country's regulatory authorities but also to international bodies and various countries' steps toward cooperation in the field of nanotechnology. This article provides a broad overview of the general approach taken by major countries in the field of nanotechnology. It also describes steps taken in international cooperation in this area and suggests possible areas of international regulatory convergence.
U.S. Oversight of Nanomaterials
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.