Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The nanotechnology industry and other interested stakeholders have kept a keen eye on various governmental regulatory bodies regarding the regulation and oversight of nanotechnology and nanomaterials. Since the mid-2000s, such bodies have generally taken a cautious approach. They have tended to utilize existing regulatory frameworks and have generally eschewed creating new frameworks or issuing regulations specific to nanotechnology. It is unlikely that this approach will continue forever as political pressure may ultimately lead to the creation of nanotechnology-specific regulatory regimes. What will such regulation look like? What would be the parameters? What definitions may be employed? To answer these questions, we may look not only to individual country's regulatory authorities but also to international bodies and various countries' steps toward cooperation in the field of nanotechnology. This article provides a broad overview of the general approach taken by major countries in the field of nanotechnology. It also describes steps taken in international cooperation in this area and suggests possible areas of international regulatory convergence.
U.S. Oversight of Nanomaterials
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.