Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are the cornerstone of any successful law firm operation. They help prevent mistakes and curb waste by providing staff with structure and a clear roadmap to follow. Without them, law firms suffer from inconsistency, chaos and lack of control. Likewise, having SOPs is a must for legal IT departments. From lost equipment to lost passwords and data, not having written policies and procedures can create liability and losses that are sometimes unrecoverable.
Legal IT professionals often experience challenges in taking their goal of having SOPs from “pie in the sky” to reality. Developing written policies and procedures takes time and dedication. It takes time to write and perfect them, and perseverance and consistency to apply and enforce them. But once they are developed and are in use, the benefits are many and the risks are dissipated.
This article explores some of the ways SOPs can be used to manage information technology and to create operational and procedural efficiencies within law firms.
Inventory Management
SOPs are instrumental to having tight inventory controls. A firm's inventory management policies, at a minimum, should include procedures and checklists for the following:
Frequently, law firms have inventory management policies in place, but success in understanding and accurately reporting inventory counts depends on how thorough SOPs are. Some of the possible consequences for firms that lack tight inventory controls include:
Having written policies and procedures for management and staff to address technology inventory helps firms keep tight controls on assets and accurately report their net worth.
The Business Continuity Plan
Thorough SOPs are also the foundation of a good business continuity plan. SOPs provide the business continuity roadmap management and staff should follow; these steps become the backbone of the plan. Although it is impossible to fully address business continuity plans in this article, it must be noted that SOPs are a must for disaster recovery.
Independent of size or complexity, every firm should have a written business/disaster recovery plan that, at a minimum, establishes and addresses:
In addition to providing a step-by-step plan, disaster recovery procedures should include action checklists with executable items for initiating and carrying out the disaster recovery plan. Checklists should include:
Once the written business continuity plan is in place, it must be tested and evaluated regularly to ensure that the processes work. Firms that have an untested disaster recovery plan in place run the risk of system failure and an increased economic impact in the event of a contingency. Further, the plan should be looked at as a changing document; one that adapts and changes as the firm's operations change.
The Technology Binder: 'A To Z' of Firm Technology
Creating a technology binder is hard work. But the consequences of not having one can make the job of any IT professional even harder. The technology binder operates as a set of SOPs; like an IT encyclopedia that contains all the information and procedures related a firm's technology infrastructure. Tech binders are no longer actual binders. Instead, they are electronic files that should be stored offsite in a secure location.
What are the reasons law firms should keep technology e-binders?
Well-organized technology e-binders typically include:
While keeping a technology binder has many upsides, security can be a concern, especially if the binder contains passwords. Therefore, it is critical that the binder be kept in a secure offsite location or that certain passwords be stored in an alternative secure location.
Training New Staff
When law firms lack written policies and procedures, training new and existing staff can be challenging, particularly for IT professionals. Managing law firm technology means managing lots of information and moving parts. When there are written policies and procedures, training becomes simpler and faster. With all of the information in one central location, new employees have a reference during and after training.
For managers, having written policies creates operational efficiencies. Training becomes consistent with all new hires learning the same information. In addition to creating consistency and repeatable processes, SOPs reduce the risk associated with employee turnover. Having SOPs in place reduces the risk of the firm's knowledge base walking out the door.
Conclusion
Just as every other law firm department should have a set of Standard Operating Procedures, so too must the IT department. SOPs are a necessity for those IT professionals who wish to create efficiencies and drive increased profitability. From managing inventory to managing information, having written policies creates consistent procedures and eliminates waste and confusion among management and staff.
In times of crisis, having written policies and procedures are also a necessity, especially for those who wish to minimize down time and economic loss.
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) are the cornerstone of any successful law firm operation. They help prevent mistakes and curb waste by providing staff with structure and a clear roadmap to follow. Without them, law firms suffer from inconsistency, chaos and lack of control. Likewise, having SOPs is a must for legal IT departments. From lost equipment to lost passwords and data, not having written policies and procedures can create liability and losses that are sometimes unrecoverable.
Legal IT professionals often experience challenges in taking their goal of having SOPs from “pie in the sky” to reality. Developing written policies and procedures takes time and dedication. It takes time to write and perfect them, and perseverance and consistency to apply and enforce them. But once they are developed and are in use, the benefits are many and the risks are dissipated.
This article explores some of the ways SOPs can be used to manage information technology and to create operational and procedural efficiencies within law firms.
Inventory Management
SOPs are instrumental to having tight inventory controls. A firm's inventory management policies, at a minimum, should include procedures and checklists for the following:
Frequently, law firms have inventory management policies in place, but success in understanding and accurately reporting inventory counts depends on how thorough SOPs are. Some of the possible consequences for firms that lack tight inventory controls include:
Having written policies and procedures for management and staff to address technology inventory helps firms keep tight controls on assets and accurately report their net worth.
The Business Continuity Plan
Thorough SOPs are also the foundation of a good business continuity plan. SOPs provide the business continuity roadmap management and staff should follow; these steps become the backbone of the plan. Although it is impossible to fully address business continuity plans in this article, it must be noted that SOPs are a must for disaster recovery.
Independent of size or complexity, every firm should have a written business/disaster recovery plan that, at a minimum, establishes and addresses:
In addition to providing a step-by-step plan, disaster recovery procedures should include action checklists with executable items for initiating and carrying out the disaster recovery plan. Checklists should include:
Once the written business continuity plan is in place, it must be tested and evaluated regularly to ensure that the processes work. Firms that have an untested disaster recovery plan in place run the risk of system failure and an increased economic impact in the event of a contingency. Further, the plan should be looked at as a changing document; one that adapts and changes as the firm's operations change.
The Technology Binder: 'A To Z' of Firm Technology
Creating a technology binder is hard work. But the consequences of not having one can make the job of any IT professional even harder. The technology binder operates as a set of SOPs; like an IT encyclopedia that contains all the information and procedures related a firm's technology infrastructure. Tech binders are no longer actual binders. Instead, they are electronic files that should be stored offsite in a secure location.
What are the reasons law firms should keep technology e-binders?
Well-organized technology e-binders typically include:
While keeping a technology binder has many upsides, security can be a concern, especially if the binder contains passwords. Therefore, it is critical that the binder be kept in a secure offsite location or that certain passwords be stored in an alternative secure location.
Training New Staff
When law firms lack written policies and procedures, training new and existing staff can be challenging, particularly for IT professionals. Managing law firm technology means managing lots of information and moving parts. When there are written policies and procedures, training becomes simpler and faster. With all of the information in one central location, new employees have a reference during and after training.
For managers, having written policies creates operational efficiencies. Training becomes consistent with all new hires learning the same information. In addition to creating consistency and repeatable processes, SOPs reduce the risk associated with employee turnover. Having SOPs in place reduces the risk of the firm's knowledge base walking out the door.
Conclusion
Just as every other law firm department should have a set of Standard Operating Procedures, so too must the IT department. SOPs are a necessity for those IT professionals who wish to create efficiencies and drive increased profitability. From managing inventory to managing information, having written policies creates consistent procedures and eliminates waste and confusion among management and staff.
In times of crisis, having written policies and procedures are also a necessity, especially for those who wish to minimize down time and economic loss.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.