Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Verdicts
Med-Mal Suit Reaps No Divorce-Related Damages
New York's high court has determined that a jury could appropriately find a doctor's affair with a patient was sufficiently related to the medical treatment he rendered to her to make him liable for medical malpractice damages when his actions caused her harm. Dupree v. Guigliano, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 3556; 2012 NY Slip Op 8171 (N.Y. 11/29/12).The plaintiff, Kristin Kahkonen Dupree, first sought treatment for depression and stress from licensed family physician James E. Giugliano in 2000. Dr. Guigliano's medical specialty is osteopathic medicine. He prescribed anti-depressants, along with exercise, to improve Dupree's mood, and referred her to a counselor. (At some point, Dr. Guigliano changed the plaintiff's prescription because she complained that the first medication he prescribed had lowered her libido.) A year and a half later after the plaintiff first sought help for her depression, she and the doctor entered into a sexual affair that began at a gym, where Dr. Guigliano was showing Dupree some exercises to alleviate her stress and anxiety. They continued the relationship for nine months, breaking it off by mutual agreement. However, when Dupree confessed the affair to her husband, he sued her for divorce. The divorce was contentious, taking five years to settle.
Dupree sued Dr. Guigliano for medical malpractice, seeking damages not only for physical and emotional harm, but also to cover the costs of her divorce proceedings ($155,000) and for the loss of her husband's financial support ($435,600). The jury found each party partially at fault and awarded Dupree damages of $154,000 for past mental distress, $50,000 for future mental distress, $134,000 for past loss of income and $166,000 in punitive damages, but nothing for the losses incurred in connection with the divorce.
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.