Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In last month's issue, we discussed at length how, when the value of a business interest is impacted by adverse events subsequent to the date of commencement outside of the titled spouse's control, courts have recognized that it would be inequitable to ascribe a date-of-commencement value. Let us now address two other scenarios where valuing a business interest as of the commencement date value would unfairly prejudice one party because the change in value is in no way attributable to the titled spouse's active efforts. In both scenarios, courts have appropriately valued the business interest as of a date subsequent to the date the action was commenced. First is the situation in which the value of the interest either increases or decreases as a result of passive market forces. And second, courts have valued business interests as of a date later than the date of commencement if the value is increased due to the efforts and contributions of the non-titled spouse.
Passive Market Forces or The Efforts of the Non-Titled Spouse
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.