Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent New York case demonstrates that the common law doctrine of champerty still poses a threat to the market for distressed debt. Historically, this doctrine barred litigation brought by assignees. In recent years, New York courts and the Legislature have restricted its ambit, thereby encouraging the development of secondary debt markets. This more limited application of the champerty doctrine has enabled buyers of distressed debt to pursue litigation, if necessary, as assignees.
But the champerty doctrine is not dead yet. In Justinian Capital, SPC v. WestLB AG, 952 N.Y.S.2d 725 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cty. Aug. 15, 2012), a New York trial court stayed a claims trader's causes of action pending further discovery about the merits of a champerty defense. On what it deemed to be an issue of first impression, the court characterized plaintiff's claims as a “scheme” to wage “litigation by proxy in exchange for a fee.” Id. at 733. Whatever the outcome of future discovery in this case, this decision is noteworthy for participants in the market for distressed debt.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.