Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
White-collar crimes tend to turn on issues of knowledge and intent. The question is rarely whether a particular e-mail was sent or a transaction occurred; it is whether an individual intended to defraud someone in the process. For that reason, the question of precisely what kind of fraudulent intent is necessary for a prosecution is particularly important. Frequently, prosecutors rely on circumstantial proof of general fraudulent intent. Thus, proof of deceptive or evasive conduct is often offered ' and is deemed sufficient ' to meet the prosecution's burden.
In a recent case, however, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit underscored that plainly fraudulent conduct is not always sufficient to satisfy the strictures of particular federal statutes. In the case of bank fraud, the Second Circuit has previously interpreted the federal statute to require specific intent to harm a financial institution. That holding was put to the test recently in United States v. Nkansah, 699 F.3d 743 (2d Cir. 2012).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.