Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania has approved a $20.9 million settlement in a wage-and-hour class and collective action against Rite Aid Corp.
U.S. District Judge John E. Jones III's final approval in the consolidated cases of Craig v. Rite Aid settles 14 class and collective actions brought across the country against Rite Aid over allegations the drugstore chain improperly designated assistant store managers and co-managers as exempt employees not eligible for overtime pay.
Years of Litigation
The settlement puts to rest four years of litigation that included one of the cases ' Knepper v. Rite Aid ' going up to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a determination that collective action claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and class action claims under state wage-and-hour laws can be brought in the same action.
Out of the 14 consolidated class and collective actions, which touched upon 4,700 Rite Aid stores and created a 7,426-member class across 31 states, about 4,000 of the potential class members have filed claims against the settlement fund, according to lead plaintiffs' counsel Seth Lesser of Klafter Olsen & Lesser in Rye Brook, NY.
The class members will get paid out of the settlement based on the amount of hours worked during the applicable period. They are expected to get, on average, $1,845 per class member, Jones said in his opinion.
Attorneys' Fees
Plaintiffs counsel will share in about $6.7 million in attorneys' fees and nearly $275,000 in costs. There were 12 firms that worked on the case for a total of more than 14,000 hours since the case was filed in 2008. Klafter Olsen spent the most hours at 3,877, followed by Winebrake & Santillo, which billed 2,395 hours. The overall attorney fee request, which was about $1 million more than the lodestar calculation of the hours worked times the hourly rates, represents 32% of the settlement less the expenses, Jones noted.
Lesser said the settlement provides that excess funds will be sent to certain cy pres award recipients. Some of any excess settlement funds will be returned to Rite Aid, Lesser said.
According to Jones' opinion, the 14 consolidated cases have collectively run the full spectrum of litigation events, including class certification and decertification motion practice, dispositive motion practice, discovery and even appellate adjudication. Lesser said a few of the cases were close to reaching trial
Why the Suit
Jones said in his opinion that the class members alleged they often worked well in excess of 40 hours per week, but were not compensated for the overtime. During the relevant time period, Rite Aid designated assistant store managers and co-managers as exempt from overtime pay requirements under the FLSA and its analogous state wage-and-hour laws. The lawsuit sought a change in the employees' designation as well as reimbursement for unpaid overtime wages.
According to Lesser, Rite Aid did change the designation of the assistant store managers and co-managers about two years ago. He said the chain wouldn't be facing these suits anymore.
Gina Passarella writes for The Legal Intelligencer, an ALM sister publication of this newsletter in which this article also appeared.
A federal judge in the Middle District of Pennsylvania has approved a $20.9 million settlement in a wage-and-hour class and collective action against Rite Aid Corp.
U.S. District Judge
Years of Litigation
The settlement puts to rest four years of litigation that included one of the cases ' Knepper v. Rite Aid ' going up to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit for a determination that collective action claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and class action claims under state wage-and-hour laws can be brought in the same action.
Out of the 14 consolidated class and collective actions, which touched upon 4,700 Rite Aid stores and created a 7,426-member class across 31 states, about 4,000 of the potential class members have filed claims against the settlement fund, according to lead plaintiffs' counsel Seth Lesser of
The class members will get paid out of the settlement based on the amount of hours worked during the applicable period. They are expected to get, on average, $1,845 per class member, Jones said in his opinion.
Attorneys' Fees
Plaintiffs counsel will share in about $6.7 million in attorneys' fees and nearly $275,000 in costs. There were 12 firms that worked on the case for a total of more than 14,000 hours since the case was filed in 2008. Klafter Olsen spent the most hours at 3,877, followed by Winebrake & Santillo, which billed 2,395 hours. The overall attorney fee request, which was about $1 million more than the lodestar calculation of the hours worked times the hourly rates, represents 32% of the settlement less the expenses, Jones noted.
Lesser said the settlement provides that excess funds will be sent to certain cy pres award recipients. Some of any excess settlement funds will be returned to Rite Aid, Lesser said.
According to Jones' opinion, the 14 consolidated cases have collectively run the full spectrum of litigation events, including class certification and decertification motion practice, dispositive motion practice, discovery and even appellate adjudication. Lesser said a few of the cases were close to reaching trial
Why the Suit
Jones said in his opinion that the class members alleged they often worked well in excess of 40 hours per week, but were not compensated for the overtime. During the relevant time period, Rite Aid designated assistant store managers and co-managers as exempt from overtime pay requirements under the FLSA and its analogous state wage-and-hour laws. The lawsuit sought a change in the employees' designation as well as reimbursement for unpaid overtime wages.
According to Lesser, Rite Aid did change the designation of the assistant store managers and co-managers about two years ago. He said the chain wouldn't be facing these suits anymore.
Gina Passarella writes for The Legal Intelligencer, an ALM sister publication of this newsletter in which this article also appeared.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.