Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Two California employment attorneys are bringing a pregnancy discrimination suit against a San Francisco area lawyer who also happens to be the daughter of a California Supreme Court justice. The very California Supreme Court justice who is expected to rule in the next couple of months in a major pregnancy discrimination case.
The Suit
Ingrid Evans and Kelly Armstrong allege in a suit filed last month in Alameda County Superior Court that Laura Baxter-Simons fired their client, Madalyn Garcia, from a Berkeley, CA, housekeeping position because of a dispute over Garcia's pregnancy disability leave. Baxter-Simons is the daughter of Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter.
The attorneys allege that Garcia's employment was going fine until April 2012, when Garcia told Baxter-Simons she was pregnant and would need a 12-week leave of absence later in the fall. Baxter-Simons felt that was too much, and the relationship turned negative, with her husband, hedge fund principal Nathaniel Simons, having to intervene in a dispute over Garcia's wish to revise her weekly schedule, the attorneys allege.
Elan Household, the limited liability corporation formed by Simons that employs the family's domestic help, then terminated Garcia in August, the suit alleges.
The suit comes a month after Justice Baxter and his colleagues heard arguments in Harris v. City of Santa Monica, a closely watched case that stems from a bus driver's pregnancy discrimination claim. The case is expected to decide the viability of the so-called mixed-motive defense under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ' a defense that could hypothetically be in play if the Garcia case proceeds.
Scott Graham is a reporter for The Recorder, an ALM sister publication of this newsletter in which this article also appeared.
Two California employment attorneys are bringing a pregnancy discrimination suit against a San Francisco area lawyer who also happens to be the daughter of a California Supreme Court justice. The very California Supreme Court justice who is expected to rule in the next couple of months in a major pregnancy discrimination case.
The Suit
Ingrid Evans and Kelly Armstrong allege in a suit filed last month in Alameda County Superior Court that Laura Baxter-Simons fired their client, Madalyn Garcia, from a Berkeley, CA, housekeeping position because of a dispute over Garcia's pregnancy disability leave. Baxter-Simons is the daughter of Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter.
The attorneys allege that Garcia's employment was going fine until April 2012, when Garcia told Baxter-Simons she was pregnant and would need a 12-week leave of absence later in the fall. Baxter-Simons felt that was too much, and the relationship turned negative, with her husband, hedge fund principal Nathaniel Simons, having to intervene in a dispute over Garcia's wish to revise her weekly schedule, the attorneys allege.
Elan Household, the limited liability corporation formed by Simons that employs the family's domestic help, then terminated Garcia in August, the suit alleges.
The suit comes a month after Justice Baxter and his colleagues heard arguments in Harris v. City of Santa Monica, a closely watched case that stems from a bus driver's pregnancy discrimination claim. The case is expected to decide the viability of the so-called mixed-motive defense under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act ' a defense that could hypothetically be in play if the Garcia case proceeds.
Scott Graham is a reporter for The Recorder, an ALM sister publication of this newsletter in which this article also appeared.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.