Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Awuah v. Coverall: What, If Anything, Does the Dicta Mean for State Regulators?

What exactly can a state regulator do with respect to arbitration clauses in franchise agreements? The answer appears to be, "The regulator cannot do much."

16 minute read January 31, 2013 at 10:03 AM
By
Jeffery S. Haff
Awuah v. Coverall: What, If Anything, Does the Dicta Mean for State Regulators?

The Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc. case primarily involves the issue of whether “franchisees” in the Coverall system were, in reality, “employees” under Massachusetts law. In a recent opinion, the First Circuit addressed the issue of an arbitration clause in the parties' franchise agreements and whether it was unenforceable.

This premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026