Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent federal district court award of $6.6 million in statutory damages to music publishers for the unlicensed use of song lyrics by the website LiveUniverse and its operator was hailed as the first of its type for owners of song lyrics, and thus a significant milestone for content owners in the digital era. Peermusic III Ltd. v. LiveUniverse Inc., 09-6160 (C.D.Calif. 2012). In addition, since September 2011 two federal appeals courts, in cases against unauthorized file-sharers, declined to void the Copyright Act's statutory damages provisions as violating constitutional due process. Capitol Records Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset, 692 F.3d 899 (8th Cir. 2012); Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, 660 F.3d 487 (1st Cir. 2011).
In the LiveUniverse case, Judge George H. Wu of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California awarded $12,500 for each of 528 songs' lyrics posted on the defendant website. The district judge also issued a permanent injunction and awarded attorney fees and costs in favor of the publishers. The statutory damages, for which judges have wide discretion, followed three contempt orders, violation of a preliminary injunction and a default judgment against LiveUniverse.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.