Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bankruptcy Code section 365 primarily concerns whether a debtor-in-possession or trustee may assume or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases (collectively, the “Contracts”) for the benefit of the estate, but the section often places the counterparties to those Contracts in the precarious position of being required to perform while running the risk that a debtor or trustee might not do so. Until a debtor decides whether to assume or reject a Contract, the terms of the Contract continue to bind the debtor and the counterparty. If the counterparty performs, it bears the risk that the debtor will reject the Contract and the debtor will be unable to pay the administrative claim owing to the counterparty for its post-petition performance. Courts generally struggle with this tension between protecting counterparties and protecting the bankruptcy estate prior to the assumption or rejection decision.
Counterparties have several available options depending on whether a pre-petition default exists under the Contract, and depending on the terms of the Contract. This article discusses how counterparties, as well as courts, react to situations where a counterparty seeks protection from the risks inherent in continued performance under a Contract with a debtor in bankruptcy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.