Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALIFORNIA
DOJ Suit Leverages FIRREA
On Feb. 5, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its filing of a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and the company's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (collectively, S&P), the credit rating agency, for their activities in the years leading up to the recent financial crisis.
Pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 12 U.S.C. ' 1833a (FIRREA), which was enacted in the wake of the 1980s savings and loan crisis and which, in relevant part, authorizes the recovery of civil penalties for specified types of fraud against financial institutions and depositors, the Complaint accused S&P of three different types of fraud. Specifically, the Government alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. ' 1341 (mail fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), 1343 (wire fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), and 1344 (financial institution fraud). These civil claims centered on S&P's actions from 2004 through 2007 in connection with Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), two types of structured financial products. The Government noted that its Complaint was the culmination of an investigation ' code-named “Alchemy” ' that had commenced in November 2009 and was a product of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.
The Complaint seeking civil monetary penalties under FIRREA was filed in the Central District of California, as that federal district is home to the now-defunct Western Federal Corporate Credit Union (WesCorp), formerly the largest corporate credit union in the country. WesCorp collapsed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis after suffering significant losses on S&P-rated RMBS and CDOs.
CALIFORNIA
DOJ Suit Leverages FIRREA
On Feb. 5, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its filing of a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and the company's wholly owned subsidiary,
Pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 12 U.S.C. ' 1833a (FIRREA), which was enacted in the wake of the 1980s savings and loan crisis and which, in relevant part, authorizes the recovery of civil penalties for specified types of fraud against financial institutions and depositors, the Complaint accused S&P of three different types of fraud. Specifically, the Government alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. ' 1341 (mail fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), 1343 (wire fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), and 1344 (financial institution fraud). These civil claims centered on S&P's actions from 2004 through 2007 in connection with Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), two types of structured financial products. The Government noted that its Complaint was the culmination of an investigation ' code-named “Alchemy” ' that had commenced in November 2009 and was a product of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.
The Complaint seeking civil monetary penalties under FIRREA was filed in the Central District of California, as that federal district is home to the now-defunct Western Federal Corporate Credit Union (WesCorp), formerly the largest corporate credit union in the country. WesCorp collapsed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis after suffering significant losses on S&P-rated RMBS and CDOs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.