Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALIFORNIA
DOJ Suit Leverages FIRREA
On Feb. 5, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its filing of a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and the company's wholly owned subsidiary, Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC (collectively, S&P), the credit rating agency, for their activities in the years leading up to the recent financial crisis.
Pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 12 U.S.C. ' 1833a (FIRREA), which was enacted in the wake of the 1980s savings and loan crisis and which, in relevant part, authorizes the recovery of civil penalties for specified types of fraud against financial institutions and depositors, the Complaint accused S&P of three different types of fraud. Specifically, the Government alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. ' 1341 (mail fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), 1343 (wire fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), and 1344 (financial institution fraud). These civil claims centered on S&P's actions from 2004 through 2007 in connection with Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), two types of structured financial products. The Government noted that its Complaint was the culmination of an investigation ' code-named “Alchemy” ' that had commenced in November 2009 and was a product of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.
The Complaint seeking civil monetary penalties under FIRREA was filed in the Central District of California, as that federal district is home to the now-defunct Western Federal Corporate Credit Union (WesCorp), formerly the largest corporate credit union in the country. WesCorp collapsed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis after suffering significant losses on S&P-rated RMBS and CDOs.
CALIFORNIA
DOJ Suit Leverages FIRREA
On Feb. 5, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its filing of a civil lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and the company's wholly owned subsidiary,
Pursuant to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 12 U.S.C. ' 1833a (FIRREA), which was enacted in the wake of the 1980s savings and loan crisis and which, in relevant part, authorizes the recovery of civil penalties for specified types of fraud against financial institutions and depositors, the Complaint accused S&P of three different types of fraud. Specifically, the Government alleged violations of 18 U.S.C. ' 1341 (mail fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), 1343 (wire fraud affecting federally insured financial institutions), and 1344 (financial institution fraud). These civil claims centered on S&P's actions from 2004 through 2007 in connection with Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs), two types of structured financial products. The Government noted that its Complaint was the culmination of an investigation ' code-named “Alchemy” ' that had commenced in November 2009 and was a product of the President's Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force.
The Complaint seeking civil monetary penalties under FIRREA was filed in the Central District of California, as that federal district is home to the now-defunct Western Federal Corporate Credit Union (WesCorp), formerly the largest corporate credit union in the country. WesCorp collapsed in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis after suffering significant losses on S&P-rated RMBS and CDOs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.