Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CRMs: The Link Between Lawyer and Client
One-third of the global in-house legal departments surveyed by market research firm Acritas (which annually surveys the General Counsel of the largest corporations in 45 countries on their experiences with their outside law firms) dropped at least one of their law firms in the past year. Respondents listed the following as their main reasons for changing firms: pricing (compared with the value delivered), less-than-stellar legal expertise, and insufficient customer service. In addition, they claimed that many firms are inefficient and spend resources unwisely, lack project management skills, and are often slow to respond, which is especially glaring in today's high-speed, highly-connected world.
Acritas CEO Lisa Hart Shepherd says a lot of these problems boil down to a lack of communication between the firms and their clients. “The main problem with law firms is that they aren't asking their clients often enough and proactively enough how they're doing.” A recent ALM survey (“Legal Client Relationship Management: The Elusive Essential”) backs this up. It found that 77% of law firm administrators believe their firms are not focused enough on understanding clients and their needs. “Firms need to ask these questions,” agrees Chris Lenhart, Senior VP & Associate General Counsel at U.S. Bank, “but in my experience, 98% of them don't.”
This premium content is locked for Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.