Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a sign of the role new technology is playing in existing business models, two federal regulators recently released guidance covering two rapidly expanding technology markets: social media and mobile technology. The first set of guidance, entitled Social Media: Consumer Compliance Risk Management Guidance, 78 Fed. Reg. 4848 (proposed Jan. 23, 2013), was issued as a proposal for comment by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), which represents the examination arm of the primary federal bank regulators (including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)). Shortly after, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a staff report entitled Mobile Privacy Disclosures: Building Trust Through Transparency (2013).'
Both sets of guidance are broadly aimed at extending existing consumer protection frameworks. In doing so, the guidance recognize the evolving and expanding nature of social media and mobile technology, setting guidelines which allow flexibility while protecting both consumers and financial institutions rather than creating new, inflexible regulatory regimes with the potential to stifle innovation. However, institutions will still need to carefully consider both sets of guidance when engaging with social media or mobile technology, as the FFIEC and the FTC establish a clear set of expectations which will likely play a role in examinations and enforcement actions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.