Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Feb. 27, 2013, the Supreme Court decided Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 11-1274, 2013 WL 691002 (U.S. Feb. 27, 2013), holding that the “discovery rule” does not apply to the general statute of limitations for civil penalties, 28 U.S.C. ' 2462 (Section 2462), in the context of an enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Court unanimously concluded that Section 2462's limitations period began to run from the date of the alleged misconduct, not from the date the SEC discovered the alleged fraud.
Although Gabelli clarifies when the SEC and other federal agencies must commence an enforcement action for penalties, it leaves unaddressed several questions regarding Section 2462's applicability. It does not address whether or how Section 2462's limitations period may be extended through theories of equitable tolling. Nor does Gabelli directly address what constitutes a “penalty” subject to Section 2462, as opposed to remedial or equitable relief considered outside of Section 2462's scope.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.