Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Landlord & Tenant

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 29, 2013

Tenant Defaults Did Not Entitle Landlord to Terminate

Gettinger Associates, LLC v. Kamber & Co.

NYLJ 2/25/13, p. 19, col. 3

AppDiv, First Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In an action by subtenants for a declaration that they were not in default, and for a permanent injunction against any action by landlord to cancel or terminate the sublease, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's grant of declaratory and injunctive relief to the subtenant. The Appellate Division modified, holding that landlord had not waived its right to enforce tenant's defaults, but also holding that the defaults did not entitle landlord to terminate the sublease.

Article 7 of the sublease agreement prohibited subtenant from spending more than $50,000 on repair work to the building's fa'ade without providing plans or a performance bond. Article 6 of the lease prohibits a tenant from assigning the sublease without landlord's approval while in default of other provisions of the sublease. Subtenant apparently made improvements to the building in violation of the provisions of Article 7. When landlord provided notice of these defaults, subtenants brought this action, and Supreme Court concluded that landlord's course of conduct manifested an intent to abandon or relinquish its right to enforce the defaults. Landlord appealed.

The Appellate Division first concluded that landlord had not evinced any intent to abandon its right to enforce the Article 7 defaults. But the court went on to hold that landlord had unreasonably delayed seeking to enforce the defaults ' with the exception of two defaults where the Appellate Division concluded that the delay in providing notice was not unreasonable. Those two involved subtenant's interior renovation of a first-floor deli and a remodeling of tenant space on the tenth floor of the building. The Appellate Division held, however, that although tenant's action constituted breaches of a substantial obligation of the tenancy, the breaches were not material, and therefore did not entitle landlord to terminate the sublease. The court then concluded that subtenant's breaches triggered the Article 6 prohibition on assignment. The court, however, held that forfeiture based on the improper assignment was unwarranted, especially because subtenant has asserted its willingness and ability to cure their default.

'

Receiver's Lease to New Tenant Precludes Wrongful Eviction

Sunset Caf, Inc. v. Metts Surf & Sports Corp.

NYLJ 2/15/13, p. 28, col. 5

AppDiv, Second Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In an action by former tenant against current tenant for wrongful ejectment, former tenant appealed from Supreme Court's award of summary judgment to the current tenant. The Appellate Division modified, holding that Supreme Court should have dismissed the complaint rather than converting current tenant's motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment, but otherwise affirmed, holding that current tenant's lease constituted documentary evidence warranting dismissal of the complaint.

In 2008, landlord leased the subject premises to the former tenant. The following year, mortgagee foreclosed on a mortgage, naming both landlord and former tenant as defendants in the foreclosure action. In the foreclosure action, Supreme Court appointed a receiver, and authorized the receiver to rent out the premises. The receiver then leased to current tenant for one year. Former tenant then brought this action against current tenant for wrongful ejectment.' Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to current tenant.

In modifying to dismiss the complaint, the Appellate Division emphasized that the lease executed by the court-appointed receiver constituted documentary evidence establishing a defense as a matter of law to the wrongful ejectment action. Because current tenants entered into possession under color of a duly executed lease, they could not have withheld the premises from former tenant by unlawful means, as required by RPAPL 853 (the wrongful ejectment statute). For the same reasons, the court dismissed former tenant's trespass claim.

'

Tenant Defaults Did Not Entitle Landlord to Terminate

Gettinger Associates, LLC v. Kamber & Co.

NYLJ 2/25/13, p. 19, col. 3

AppDiv, First Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In an action by subtenants for a declaration that they were not in default, and for a permanent injunction against any action by landlord to cancel or terminate the sublease, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's grant of declaratory and injunctive relief to the subtenant. The Appellate Division modified, holding that landlord had not waived its right to enforce tenant's defaults, but also holding that the defaults did not entitle landlord to terminate the sublease.

Article 7 of the sublease agreement prohibited subtenant from spending more than $50,000 on repair work to the building's fa'ade without providing plans or a performance bond. Article 6 of the lease prohibits a tenant from assigning the sublease without landlord's approval while in default of other provisions of the sublease. Subtenant apparently made improvements to the building in violation of the provisions of Article 7. When landlord provided notice of these defaults, subtenants brought this action, and Supreme Court concluded that landlord's course of conduct manifested an intent to abandon or relinquish its right to enforce the defaults. Landlord appealed.

The Appellate Division first concluded that landlord had not evinced any intent to abandon its right to enforce the Article 7 defaults. But the court went on to hold that landlord had unreasonably delayed seeking to enforce the defaults ' with the exception of two defaults where the Appellate Division concluded that the delay in providing notice was not unreasonable. Those two involved subtenant's interior renovation of a first-floor deli and a remodeling of tenant space on the tenth floor of the building. The Appellate Division held, however, that although tenant's action constituted breaches of a substantial obligation of the tenancy, the breaches were not material, and therefore did not entitle landlord to terminate the sublease. The court then concluded that subtenant's breaches triggered the Article 6 prohibition on assignment. The court, however, held that forfeiture based on the improper assignment was unwarranted, especially because subtenant has asserted its willingness and ability to cure their default.

'

Receiver's Lease to New Tenant Precludes Wrongful Eviction

Sunset Caf, Inc. v. Metts Surf & Sports Corp.

NYLJ 2/15/13, p. 28, col. 5

AppDiv, Second Dept.

(memorandum opinion)

In an action by former tenant against current tenant for wrongful ejectment, former tenant appealed from Supreme Court's award of summary judgment to the current tenant. The Appellate Division modified, holding that Supreme Court should have dismissed the complaint rather than converting current tenant's motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment, but otherwise affirmed, holding that current tenant's lease constituted documentary evidence warranting dismissal of the complaint.

In 2008, landlord leased the subject premises to the former tenant. The following year, mortgagee foreclosed on a mortgage, naming both landlord and former tenant as defendants in the foreclosure action. In the foreclosure action, Supreme Court appointed a receiver, and authorized the receiver to rent out the premises. The receiver then leased to current tenant for one year. Former tenant then brought this action against current tenant for wrongful ejectment.' Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to current tenant.

In modifying to dismiss the complaint, the Appellate Division emphasized that the lease executed by the court-appointed receiver constituted documentary evidence establishing a defense as a matter of law to the wrongful ejectment action. Because current tenants entered into possession under color of a duly executed lease, they could not have withheld the premises from former tenant by unlawful means, as required by RPAPL 853 (the wrongful ejectment statute). For the same reasons, the court dismissed former tenant's trespass claim.

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.