Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Suppose a buyer contracts to purchase a retail shopping center for $10 million, paying a deposit of $100,000. Two weeks later, the buyer has second thoughts, and informs the seller that it will not close on the sale contract, and that buyer is prepared to forfeit the deposit. The seller makes immediate efforts to resell the center, but within three months, the area's major employer announces the closing of its plant. A year later, the seller resells for $7 million. What damages may the seller recover from the original breaching buyer? In White v. Farrell, decided last month, the Court of Appeals suggested ' over the objection of two concurring judges ' that the answer might be zero. But because White v. Farrell itself did not present the stark facts suggested in the introductory hypothetical, some chance remains that the hypothetical seller could recover damages.
The White Case
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.