Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
April 30, 2013

Fifth Circuit Supports Perpetual License as Remedy for Video-Game Dispute

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit upheld a perpetual license an arbitrator awarded a video-game publisher in a game's intellectual property rights ' as a remedy for the publisher's contract dispute with the game developer. Timegate Studios Inc. v. Southpeak Interactive LLC, 12-20256. Video-game developer Timegate and publisher Gamecock Media Group (now owned by Southpeak Interactive) entered into a contract to develop the futuristic game Section 8. The parties subsequently entered arbitration on Timegate's claims that Southpeak wasn't properly paying over profits. But the arbitrator instead awarded Southpeak a perpetual license in Section 8's intellectual property rights, on the ground that Timegate had breached the video-game agreement by failing to meet its promises and that the developer fraudulently induced Gamecock to enter into the contract. The Fifth Circuit noted: 'Timegate committed an extraordinary breach of the Agreement [e.g., by failing to use any of its own promised $2.5 million on the game] and an equally extraordinary realignment of the parties' original rights is necessary to preserve the essence of the Agreement. Because the Agreement bestowed broad remedial powers upon the arbitrator and because it was fraudulently induced and irreversibly violated by Timegate, the perpetual license is a rational and permissible attempt to compensate Gamecock and maintain the Agreement's essence.'


Musical Composition Doesn't Infringe Screenplay

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.