Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

In the Marketplace

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
April 30, 2013

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) voted to extend the comment period for its proposal to improve financial reporting about expected credit losses on loans and other financial assets held by banks, financial institutions, and other public and private organizations. The new comment deadline on Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments ' Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15) is May 31, 2013. The decision was made in response to stakeholder requests for more time to consider the FASB's proposals on credit losses as well as the related staff “Frequently Asked Questions” document. Stakeholders also expressed a desire to consider the International Accounting Standards Board's (“IASB”) proposal on credit losses, which was issued for public comment on March 7, 2013.

The FASB's proposed model would utilize a single “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses, replacing the multiple existing impairment models in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The current models generally require that a loss be “incurred” before it is recognized. Under the FASB proposal, management would be required to estimate the cash flows that it does not expect to collect using all available information, including historical experience and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future.

The FASB model and the IASB model both would require that expected credit losses be estimated based on past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future. The amount of credit loss that is ultimately recognized would be the same under both the FASB and the IASB impairment models.

The difference between the models relates to when losses that are currently expected would be recognized. Under the FASB model, an entity would record its current estimate of expected credit losses every period. The IASB model would record a portion of the expected credit losses until significant credit deterioration has occurred, at which point the full estimate of expected credit losses would be recognized.

The FASB will consider the comments received on its proposal as well as the comments received by the IASB on its proposal.

'

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) voted to extend the comment period for its proposal to improve financial reporting about expected credit losses on loans and other financial assets held by banks, financial institutions, and other public and private organizations. The new comment deadline on Proposed Accounting Standards Update, Financial Instruments ' Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15) is May 31, 2013. The decision was made in response to stakeholder requests for more time to consider the FASB's proposals on credit losses as well as the related staff “Frequently Asked Questions” document. Stakeholders also expressed a desire to consider the International Accounting Standards Board's (“IASB”) proposal on credit losses, which was issued for public comment on March 7, 2013.

The FASB's proposed model would utilize a single “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses, replacing the multiple existing impairment models in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The current models generally require that a loss be “incurred” before it is recognized. Under the FASB proposal, management would be required to estimate the cash flows that it does not expect to collect using all available information, including historical experience and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future.

The FASB model and the IASB model both would require that expected credit losses be estimated based on past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts about the future. The amount of credit loss that is ultimately recognized would be the same under both the FASB and the IASB impairment models.

The difference between the models relates to when losses that are currently expected would be recognized. Under the FASB model, an entity would record its current estimate of expected credit losses every period. The IASB model would record a portion of the expected credit losses until significant credit deterioration has occurred, at which point the full estimate of expected credit losses would be recognized.

The FASB will consider the comments received on its proposal as well as the comments received by the IASB on its proposal.

'

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.