Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Viacom failed again to persuade a U.S. district judge to let it proceed with its massive copyright infringement suit against YouTube and parent company Google. Viacom alleged that YouTube knowingly lets its users post clips from copyrighted Viacom shows and movies; YouTube countered that copyrighted material was posted without its knowledge, and that it deleted clips as soon as it discovered that they were suspect.
In the latest ruling, Judge Louis Stanton of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube Inc. 07 Civ. 2103. District Judge Stanton had granted the defendants' previous motion for summary judgment in 2010, finding that YouTube was protected by the safe harbor provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which shields parties that quickly remove infringing material. But a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed Judge Stanton's ruling in 2012. Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube Inc. 676 F.3d 19 (2d Cir. 2012). The panel directed Stanton to examine whether YouTube was aware that around 77,000 specific clips were infringing.
Hearing the case for the second time, Judge Stanton found that it was up to copyright owners such as Viacom ' and not YouTube ' to show that specific clips were infringing. According to the judge, '[P]laintiffs lack proof that YouTube had knowledge or awareness of specific infringement,' and as a result, YouTube was still protected by the DMCA's safe harbor provisions. Viacom announced it planned to appeal.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.