Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002, public companies and their advisers have been seeking guidance on Section 402 of the Act (codified as Section 13(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), which imposed a prohibition on public companies extending loans to their directors and executive officers.'
Under Section 402, public companies were no longer permitted “to extend or maintain credit, to arrange for the extension of credit, or to renew an extension of credit, in the form of a personal loan to or for any director or executive officer,” either directly or indirectly through a subsidiary or otherwise. The concerns addressed by this blanket prohibition were the use and abuse of public company funds to provide personal financing to insiders. However, many corporate practices among public companies and insiders that have the character of a “loan” or an “arrangement of credit” do not present the concerns that Section 402 was designed to address. For example, cashless exercises of stock options or the advancement of travel or relocation expenses could be deemed to fall within the term “personal loan.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.