Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Business Crimes Hotline
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
89 Individuals Face Medicare Fraud Scheme-Related Charges
On May 14, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its sixth Medicare fraud nationwide takedown since the inception of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in March 2007. The takedown included charges against 89 individuals for their respective roles in approximately $223 million in alleged false billings, principally for medically unnecessary treatments and treatments that were never administered.
Consistent with the locations of operations for the Strike Force, charges were filed in the following cities across the country: Baton Rouge, LA; Brooklyn, NY; Chicago; Detroit; Houston; Los Angeles; Miami; New Orleans; and Tampa, FL. The 89 people charged as part of the takedown include a mix of healthcare company owners, nurses, doctors, and other licensed medical professionals.
While the prosecutions stem from a host of alleged schemes tied to assorted medical services and treatments, they principally allege fraud in connection with home healthcare services. The charges levied include a host of healthcare fraud-related counts, such as conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, money laundering, and anti-kickback statute violations.
The Strike Force, a joint effort of DOJ and the Department of Health and Human Services, includes investigators on the local, state and federal levels. As part of its press release, DOJ noted that, to date, charges had been levied by the Strike Force against more than 1,500 individuals in connection with fraud schemes surpassing $5 billion.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
89 Individuals Face Medicare Fraud Scheme-Related Charges
On May 14, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced its sixth Medicare fraud nationwide takedown since the inception of the Medicare Fraud Strike Force in March 2007. The takedown included charges against 89 individuals for their respective roles in approximately $223 million in alleged false billings, principally for medically unnecessary treatments and treatments that were never administered.
Consistent with the locations of operations for the Strike Force, charges were filed in the following cities across the country: Baton Rouge, LA; Brooklyn, NY; Chicago; Detroit; Houston; Los Angeles; Miami; New Orleans; and Tampa, FL. The 89 people charged as part of the takedown include a mix of healthcare company owners, nurses, doctors, and other licensed medical professionals.
While the prosecutions stem from a host of alleged schemes tied to assorted medical services and treatments, they principally allege fraud in connection with home healthcare services. The charges levied include a host of healthcare fraud-related counts, such as conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, money laundering, and anti-kickback statute violations.
The Strike Force, a joint effort of DOJ and the Department of Health and Human Services, includes investigators on the local, state and federal levels. As part of its press release, DOJ noted that, to date, charges had been levied by the Strike Force against more than 1,500 individuals in connection with fraud schemes surpassing $5 billion.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?