Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Funds can come up missing in any law firm, and the cause can be intentional theft that qualifies as fraud or embezzlement, or an unintentional mistake that shows poor judgment. Lawyers and law firm staff can be involved in either case, but when dishonest conduct is committed by others in the firm, the lawyers are still themselves ethically responsible. Various factors make law firms susceptible to such problems: part-time lawyer management, lawyers' lack of business competency, and decentralized authority to bill clients and approve disbursements.
Theoretically, financial impropriety should not be an issue in a firm that adheres to accepted ethical standards. For lawyers, ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4 prohibits any “criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer” as well as “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” The Rules are equally clear for staff: The commentary on Rule 5.3 notes that “a lawyer must give ' assistants appropriate instruction and supervision concerning the ethical aspects of their employment.” However, in an accounting sense, deviations from the straight and narrow by lawyers or staff can happen in any firm. Consider the two scenarios mentioned above: intentional theft and unintentional mistake.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.