Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Plaintiffs' lawyers generally prefer to litigate in state courts for numerous reasons. First of all, most of them have more experience in state court and thus are up to date with their local rules, nuances' and jurists' idiosyncrasies. Also, many states do not curtail experts' opinions as much as Daubert and its progeny do. If an MDL has been formed, many lawyers do not like getting tied up in a case where the venue may be many miles from their home states. Also, a federal jury requires unanimity, whereas most states permit partial verdicts.
Last, but not least, many lawyers think, often incorrectly, that their cases will settle faster in a state court. They think that involvement in an MDL guarantees that the case will go on for years; however, when commencing a state court action, practitioners must be careful not to trigger a removal to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441, the removal statute, or 28 U.S.C. 1332, the diversity statute containing the recently passed Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA). (CAFA also applies to mass tort actions which are now known as “mass actions” under the statute.)
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.