Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Due Diligence Considerations in M&A Deals in Entertainment, Sports and Media Industries

By Sean A. Monroe, Jeannine Tang, Silvia Vannini
May 31, 2013

For entertainment, sports and media (ESM) industries bidders ' and their counsel ' contemplating a merger-and-acquisition deal, last year's Delaware Supreme Court decision in RAA Management LLC v. Savage Sport Holdings Inc., 45 A.3d 107 (Del. 2012), highlighted the importance of assessing risk early in the due diligence process. In RAA, the bidder sought to recover its due diligence expenses, claiming that the target company knowingly included false statements in its due diligence disclosures. The state supreme court, however, affirmed the dismissal of the bidder's complaint, holding that the non-reliance and waiver clause in the parties' nondisclosure agreement (NDA) barred the bidder from recovering its expenses ' even where the disclosures were allegedly false. In doing so, the court declined to distinguish between disclosures that were inaccurate because of negligence or mistake and those that were inaccurate because of fraud.

Generally, sellers begin the due diligence process with an NDA to protect the confidentiality of information they are disclosing and to limit their liability arising from such disclosure. Bidders must evaluate this information to value the target and assess its potential business and legal risks. As was the case in RAA, NDAs typically include a non-reliance clause in which the bidder acknowledges that the seller makes no representations or warranties with respect to the information it discloses and that any representations or warranties would be made only in the definitive agreements.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.