Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Due Diligence Considerations in M&A Deals in Entertainment, Sports and Media Industries

By Sean A. Monroe, Jeannine Tang, Silvia Vannini
May 31, 2013

For entertainment, sports and media (ESM) industries bidders ' and their counsel ' contemplating a merger-and-acquisition deal, last year's Delaware Supreme Court decision in RAA Management LLC v. Savage Sport Holdings Inc., 45 A.3d 107 (Del. 2012), highlighted the importance of assessing risk early in the due diligence process. In RAA, the bidder sought to recover its due diligence expenses, claiming that the target company knowingly included false statements in its due diligence disclosures. The state supreme court, however, affirmed the dismissal of the bidder's complaint, holding that the non-reliance and waiver clause in the parties' nondisclosure agreement (NDA) barred the bidder from recovering its expenses ' even where the disclosures were allegedly false. In doing so, the court declined to distinguish between disclosures that were inaccurate because of negligence or mistake and those that were inaccurate because of fraud.

Generally, sellers begin the due diligence process with an NDA to protect the confidentiality of information they are disclosing and to limit their liability arising from such disclosure. Bidders must evaluate this information to value the target and assess its potential business and legal risks. As was the case in RAA, NDAs typically include a non-reliance clause in which the bidder acknowledges that the seller makes no representations or warranties with respect to the information it discloses and that any representations or warranties would be made only in the definitive agreements.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.