Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

IP News

By Howard J. Shire and Bradley Roush
May 31, 2013

Software Patent Does Not Qualify As Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

On May 10, 2013, the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation (2011-1301), issued an en banc per curiam order affirming the district court's ruling that Alice's software patents were not directed to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. ' 101. Per Curiam Order at 6-7. Alice's patents related to financial-services software that reduced settlement risk by facilitating a trade through third-party intermediation. Lourie Op. at 10. Meanwhile, the claims in Alice's patents were of three types: 1) method claims, 2) computer-readable medium claims, and 3) system claims. Id. at 2-4.

The per curiam order is the only precedential portion of the decision; no precedential decision was reached with respect to any other issue. See Id. at 2, n. 1. Seven of the 10 judges found that the method and computer-readable medium claims were not patent-eligible subject matter. However, only five judges found that the system claims were not patent-eligible subject matter. Id. Furthermore, eight judges agreed that all three types of claims “should rise or fall together in the ' 101 analysis.” Id.

Instead, the court issued six opinions, which each differ to varying degrees on the proper test for determining patent-eligible subject matter under ' 101. The main opinion authored by Judge Alan D. Lourie and joined by Judges Timothy B. Dyk, Sharon Prost, Jimmie V. Reyna and Evan J. Wallach reasoned that the test should be a flexible claim-by-claim analysis that focuses on whether the claims add “significantly more” to a basic abstract concept. Id. at 16. And, for each of the claims-at-issue, the main opinion found that “[t]he concept of reducing settlement risk by facilitating a trade through third-party intermediation is an abstract idea because it is a 'disembodied' concept, a basic building block of human ingenuity, untethered from any real-world application. Standing alone, that abstract idea is not patent-eligible subject matter.” Id. at 26 (internal citation omitted).'

Meanwhile, Chief Judge Randall R. Rader (in the second opinion) authored a concurrence-in-part (with respect to the method and computer-readable medium claims) and dissent-in-part (with respect to the system claims) that was joined by Judges Richard Linn, Kimberly A. Moore and Kathleen M. O'Malley. According to Chief Judge Rader's opinion, “any requirement for 'inventiveness' beyond sections 102 and 103 is inconsistent with the language and intent of the Patent Act.” Rader Op. at 11. Furthermore, the opinion went on to conclude that the system claims were patent-eligible subject matter because “[t]he 'abstract idea' present here is not disembodied at all, but is instead integrated into a system utilizing machines.” Id. at 38.

Nevertheless, no precedential opinion was reached as to what the proper test should be for patent-eligible subject matter under ' 101 with respect to any type of claim. The remaining opinions discussed various additional concerns regarding ' 101.


Howard J. Shire is a partner and Bradley Roush is an associate in the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP.

'

'

'

'

Software Patent Does Not Qualify As Patent-Eligible Subject Matter

On May 10, 2013, the Federal Circuit in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation (2011-1301), issued an en banc per curiam order affirming the district court's ruling that Alice's software patents were not directed to patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. ' 101. Per Curiam Order at 6-7. Alice's patents related to financial-services software that reduced settlement risk by facilitating a trade through third-party intermediation. Lourie Op. at 10. Meanwhile, the claims in Alice's patents were of three types: 1) method claims, 2) computer-readable medium claims, and 3) system claims. Id. at 2-4.

The per curiam order is the only precedential portion of the decision; no precedential decision was reached with respect to any other issue. See Id. at 2, n. 1. Seven of the 10 judges found that the method and computer-readable medium claims were not patent-eligible subject matter. However, only five judges found that the system claims were not patent-eligible subject matter. Id. Furthermore, eight judges agreed that all three types of claims “should rise or fall together in the ' 101 analysis.” Id.

Instead, the court issued six opinions, which each differ to varying degrees on the proper test for determining patent-eligible subject matter under ' 101. The main opinion authored by Judge Alan D. Lourie and joined by Judges Timothy B. Dyk, Sharon Prost, Jimmie V. Reyna and Evan J. Wallach reasoned that the test should be a flexible claim-by-claim analysis that focuses on whether the claims add “significantly more” to a basic abstract concept. Id. at 16. And, for each of the claims-at-issue, the main opinion found that “[t]he concept of reducing settlement risk by facilitating a trade through third-party intermediation is an abstract idea because it is a 'disembodied' concept, a basic building block of human ingenuity, untethered from any real-world application. Standing alone, that abstract idea is not patent-eligible subject matter.” Id. at 26 (internal citation omitted).'

Meanwhile, Chief Judge Randall R. Rader (in the second opinion) authored a concurrence-in-part (with respect to the method and computer-readable medium claims) and dissent-in-part (with respect to the system claims) that was joined by Judges Richard Linn, Kimberly A. Moore and Kathleen M. O'Malley. According to Chief Judge Rader's opinion, “any requirement for 'inventiveness' beyond sections 102 and 103 is inconsistent with the language and intent of the Patent Act.” Rader Op. at 11. Furthermore, the opinion went on to conclude that the system claims were patent-eligible subject matter because “[t]he 'abstract idea' present here is not disembodied at all, but is instead integrated into a system utilizing machines.” Id. at 38.

Nevertheless, no precedential opinion was reached as to what the proper test should be for patent-eligible subject matter under ' 101 with respect to any type of claim. The remaining opinions discussed various additional concerns regarding ' 101.


Howard J. Shire is a partner and Bradley Roush is an associate in the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP.

'

'

'

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.