Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The calls for amending the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) have grown louder. Internet activists alarmed by the January suicide of computer programmer and fellow activist Aaron Swartz, who was facing a prison term for downloading research materials from an academic website, have argued that the CFAA must be amended so that individuals do not face prison for violating a company's terms of service (TOS). Others have argued that the CFAA should be strengthened to reflect the increased threat of international computer hackers, especially from China. Finally, still others have stressed that the CFAA should be amended to address a number of issues that have divided courts over the interpretation of the CFAA.
In response, several bills have been introduced in Congress offering amendments to the CFAA. The question is whether Congress will use this opportunity to draft a law that attempts to reflect the interests of all U.S. citizens or simply increase the criminal penalties for violating the CFAA so as to appear tough on crime.The early returns are not encouraging. According to Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI), the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations ' which held a hearing on amending the CFAA ' while it may be time for Congress to 'augment and improve' the CFAA to address international criminal groups, he would be concerned about any proposal that would decriminalize computer abuse that is currently illegal.
Renewed Interest in CFAA
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?