Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
I've got a hypothetical for you: Let's say that one of your employees tapes an anonymous letter onto the wall between the restrooms where customers can see it. The letter makes allegations of discrimination that have never been reported to you through the normal reporting policy. Rumor has it that the anonymous writer is the same woman whom you put on a “Last Chance Agreement” last month for failing to meet productivity goals. A couple of days later, you terminate her for violating her agreement, following a loud argument full of curse words with a member of management. However, you later discover that the person who posted the anonymous letter was someone else.
Or what about this one: You've got another employee who has been a major problem. He's had a number of write-ups and is on his last warning. Any subsequent offense will lead to a termination of his employment. In a totally unrelated incident, someone files a complaint with OSHA, and you are the recipient of a surprise on-site inspection. The next day, when the problem employee is five minutes late, you terminate him.
Or: Two employees of a retail establishment are best friends and roommates who spend a lot of time together. One has been disciplined a number of times, and you are getting ready to fire her for a failure to follow company rules. Then, the other files a charge of race and sex discrimination with the EEOC. You go ahead and fire the first employee anyway.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.