Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is ironic that the “Big Bang” ' otherwise known as the day UK Lord Justice Jackson's case management and litigation cost reforms became effective ' took place on April Fools Day, because these reforms are no joke. In fact, they are the most earth-shattering developments in recent UK civil procedure history, with serious ramifications that extend across the pond to U.S. companies. Failing to meet the new timelines the reforms set forth for eDiscovery (eDisclosure in the UK) can have disastrous consequences: it can destroy transparency, ruin efforts to cooperate with opposing counsel, damage a party's relationship with the court, and thwart the recovery of costs.
eDiscovery Changes
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.