Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On April 10, 2013, the United States Sentencing Commission promulgated its annual amendments to the federal sentencing guidelines. These amendments continue the trend, which we described in these pagesone year ago (David Debold and Matthew Benjamin, Increased Fraud Penalties Are on the Horizon, 19 Business Crimes Bulletin 11 (July 2012)), of stiffened sentences for economic crimes. Specifically, the Commission voted to increase penalties for: 1) theft and fraud involving pre-retail medical products; 2) trafficking in counterfeit drugs and military equipment; and 3) foreign dissemination of stolen trade secrets.
In a rare and welcome bit of good news for white-collar defendants, however, the Commission also made an important change that will reduce sentences for tax offenses. A current rule in several federal circuits frequently causes “tax loss” to be overstated for sentencing purposes: It directs courts to consider only the amount of undeclared income, thus forbidding consideration of the deductions that would have been available had the defendant reported the undeclared income. The amendment will now require courts to consider the other side of the ledger: related deductions, exemptions, or credits that could have been included on a lawfully filed tax return, thus reducing the tax that was owed.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.