Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
June 21, 2013

NEW YORK

SEC Reaches First FCPA-Related Non Prosecution Agreement with Ralph
Lauren Corp.

On April 22, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (collectively, Government) separately announced that they had each reached agreements with Ralph Lauren Corporation in connection with parallel investigations into FCPA allegations at the New York-based clothing company. The SEC's Non Prosecution Agreement (NPA) represents the Commission's first FCPA-related NPA. The settlements principally arise from allegations of improper payments to Argentinean government officials as part of the customs clearance process for the company's merchandise over a five-year period. The payments, which were channeled through a customs agency that generated corresponding false invoices to cover the payments, were provided in exchange for avoiding inspection, securing necessary paperwork, clearing prohibited items, and clearing items without necessary paperwork.'

'

The DOJ noted that Ralph Lauren's Argentinean subsidiary did not have an anti-corruption program in place during the time of the alleged improper payments, but also discussed the company's significant efforts at investigation and remediation ' starting with a self-disclosure of the conduct. Ralph Lauren's investigative efforts included conducting a worldwide risk assessment and presenting the results of the same to the Government, while its “early and extensive” remediation efforts included enhancements to its due diligence protocols for third-party agents, as well as the appointment of a dedicated corporate compliance attorney.

In connection with the DOJ NPA settlement, Ralph Lauren agreed to pay a fine of $882,000. The SEC's settlement included a commitment by the company to pay a total of $734,846 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

'

'

NEW YORK

SEC Reaches First FCPA-Related Non Prosecution Agreement with Ralph
Lauren Corp.

On April 22, 2013, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (collectively, Government) separately announced that they had each reached agreements with Ralph Lauren Corporation in connection with parallel investigations into FCPA allegations at the New York-based clothing company. The SEC's Non Prosecution Agreement (NPA) represents the Commission's first FCPA-related NPA. The settlements principally arise from allegations of improper payments to Argentinean government officials as part of the customs clearance process for the company's merchandise over a five-year period. The payments, which were channeled through a customs agency that generated corresponding false invoices to cover the payments, were provided in exchange for avoiding inspection, securing necessary paperwork, clearing prohibited items, and clearing items without necessary paperwork.'

'

The DOJ noted that Ralph Lauren's Argentinean subsidiary did not have an anti-corruption program in place during the time of the alleged improper payments, but also discussed the company's significant efforts at investigation and remediation ' starting with a self-disclosure of the conduct. Ralph Lauren's investigative efforts included conducting a worldwide risk assessment and presenting the results of the same to the Government, while its “early and extensive” remediation efforts included enhancements to its due diligence protocols for third-party agents, as well as the appointment of a dedicated corporate compliance attorney.

In connection with the DOJ NPA settlement, Ralph Lauren agreed to pay a fine of $882,000. The SEC's settlement included a commitment by the company to pay a total of $734,846 in disgorgement and prejudgment interest.

'

'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.